学生参观私人博物馆不小心摔碎价值130万的文物


e4ea-d2da62e5be1ce6ffc38eaaab31195418.png


近日,湖北武汉一家长爆料称,孩子参加5天1000元的校外培训机构冬令营活动,在参观“私人博物馆”时不慎打碎价值“130万”的文物(陶俑)。家长提出两点质疑,一是该文物价值130万元的真实性,二是如此贵重的文物摆放怎如此随意,且不牢固?

Recently, a parent in Wuhan, Hubei revealed that his child accidentally broke "1.3 million" worth of cultural relics (terracotta figurines) when visiting the "private museum" after participating in a five-day 1000 yuan winter camp of off campus training institutions. Parents raised two questions: first, the authenticity of the cultural relics worth 1.3 million yuan; second, how can such valuable cultural relics be placed so casually and not firmly?


从监控画面中可以看到,当时一名学生经过陶俑的时候,身体不慎触碰到陶俑的手部,注意,是触碰而不是撞击或推倒,结果陶俑就从中间部位断成了两截,摔在地上破损。蹊跷的是,意外发生后,众人都上前去围观,而带队老师却始终站在后面“漠不关心”,一直看着手机。

It can be seen from the monitoring screen that when a student passed the terracotta figures, his body accidentally touched the hand of the terracotta figures. Note that it was touch rather than impact or push down. As a result, the terracotta figures broke in two from the middle and fell to the ground. Strangely, after the accident, everyone came forward to watch, but the teacher who led the team always stood behind "indifferent" and kept looking at the mobile phone.



0269-199da45a07e58d7504ea6a6e29ca9651.png


事发后,馆方已报警,文物的修复费用和具体损失赔偿还在协商中。

After the incident, the museum has called the police, and the repair cost and specific loss compensation of cultural relics are still under negotiation.


9c2f-73717ff1954ea1d3f99c047c44232ffc.png


对此网友们也是纷纷热议:

In this regard, netizens also talked about it one after another:


“是不是该找个专业的第三方鉴定真伪?若是真的,博物馆自己怠于保护,有故意为之之嫌;若是假的,博物馆有敲诈之嫌。”

"Should we find a professional third party to identify the authenticity? If it is true, the museum is lazy to protect itself and is suspected of doing it deliberately; if it is false, the museum is suspected of extortion."


“这次也不怪孩子,根本没看见他伸手碰,这么容易掉下来的东西会是文物?我们这边一个没啥欣赏价值的陶罐都用玻璃罩着呢。”

"I don't blame the child this time. I didn't see him touch it at all. What can fall so easily is a cultural relic? A pottery pot with little appreciation value here is covered with glass."


“不是真文物吧,是拿来碰瓷学生的吧。就算是文物,这样置放太随便了吧。这和法拉利在马路上走S线有啥区别?出意外是早晚的事。”

"It's not a real cultural relic. It's used to touch porcelain students. Even if it's a cultural relic, it's too casual. What's the difference between this and Ferrari taking the s line on the road? It's sooner or later to have an accident."


不得不说,这个所谓的私人博物馆要是不能拿出一个合理的解释,解释为何如此贵重的文物却摆放如此随意,是很难服众的。也希望大家要引以为戒,不管到底是真文物还是真碰瓷,去参观博物馆的时候,千万要小心文物,不要随意触摸。否则真遇到了这样的事情,最后没事也会惹上一身骚。

It has to be said that if the so-called private museum can not come up with a reasonable explanation for why such valuable cultural relics are placed so casually, it is difficult to convince the public. I also hope you should take a warning. No matter whether it's real cultural relics or real porcelain, when you visit the museum, be careful of cultural relics and don't touch them at will. Otherwise, if you really encounter such a thing, you will get coquettish in the end.


9e2a-702a10922d9d48cae2b3b2ef94fc3fe7.png

作者
文章赞赏列表
相关新闻

标签相关

0 条 评 论 Write a Response

发 表 您 的 评 论